Guide
Treatment add-ons: what's proven?
What the ratings mean
- Green
High-quality evidence shows it's effective at improving the outcome.
- Amber
Conflicting evidence – it's not clear whether it's effective.
- Grey
Not enough good-quality evidence to rate it.
- Black
Good evidence shows it has no effect on the outcome.
- Red
Potential safety concerns, or evidence it may reduce the chance of success.
The HFEA's ratings
Rating for improving the chance of a baby for most patients. Some add-ons have separate ratings for other outcomes or groups.
Elective freeze-all cycles – Amber
Freezing all embryos and transferring later, rather than a fresh transfer.
Embryo glue (hyaluronate-enriched medium) – Amber
A culture fluid the embryo is placed in before transfer.
Endometrial scratching – Amber
Scratching the womb lining before treatment.
Androgen supplementation (DHEA, testosterone) – Grey
Male hormones taken before IVF, usually suggested for 'poor responders'.
Assisted hatching – Grey
Thinning or making a hole in the embryo's outer shell to 'help it implant'.
IMSI – Grey
Selecting sperm for ICSI using high magnification.
Intralipids – Grey
An immune treatment given by drip.
Intrauterine culture – Grey
Growing the embryo inside the womb in a device for a short time.
Microbiome testing – Grey
Testing bacteria in the womb or vagina.
Sperm DNA fragmentation testing – Grey
Testing for damage to the DNA in sperm.
PICSI (for male-factor ICSI) – Black
Choosing sperm that bind to a hyaluronan gel.
Time-lapse imaging and incubation – Black
Taking continuous photos of embryos as they develop.
Endometrial receptivity testing (e.g. ERA) – Red
A biopsy of the womb lining to time embryo transfer.
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) – Red
An immune treatment made from blood products.
PGT-A (aneuploidy testing) – Red
Testing embryos for an abnormal number of chromosomes.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) – Red
Injecting a concentrate of your own blood into the ovaries or womb.
Steroids (glucocorticoids) – Red
Immune-suppressing steroids during treatment.
Before you pay for an add-on
- For most people, proven treatment on its own is effective. If you're paying, extra cycles may be a better use of money than unproven add-ons.
- An October 2023 consensus statement by the HFEA and professional bodies says add-ons without strong evidence should only be offered in research – and you shouldn't be charged to take part.
- Ask why an add-on is being suggested for you specifically, and ask to see the evidence.
- The Competition and Markets Authority's guidance says clinics must give clear, upfront pricing and not mislead you about add-ons.
Sources
Ratings checked November 2026.